Downright Upright

RSS

Posts tagged with "ucb"

May 9

Okay, that streaming thing I shared yesterday ended up being way cooler than I recognized. Basically, each of the major Los Angeles schools (The Miles Stroth Workshop, UCB, Groundlings, Second City, iO West) are represented and they each discuss their approach to improv in philosophy and training. I’ve only watched the first 25 minutes…. pretty great so far.

A must watch. 

UPDATE: I just finished watching this, and when I get some free time I’ll pull some of the highlights for all the non-nerds who don’t want to watch an hour and 20 minute video on improv. That being said, I’m feeling pretty proud to have trained and performed with the Miles Stroth Workshop for the past year and a half. Miles always speaks in concrete terms and with the utmost clarity. Plus, he always has a great Del story in his back pocket.

If you’ve ever wondered what it’s like to take a class with him, this video gives a taste, and I highly recommend checking it out and his school.

This will be very funny.
Private Street has been winning the UCB Cagematch and now they’re putting up their very own spank at UCB. I recommend seeing this so hard.
It’s this Wednesday at 6:30 at UCB LA. You can get rezzies here.

This will be very funny.

Private Street has been winning the UCB Cagematch and now they’re putting up their very own spank at UCB. I recommend seeing this so hard.

It’s this Wednesday at 6:30 at UCB LA. You can get rezzies here.

UCB LA instructors perform the Harold

I always wanted a show like this: UCB teachers performing the Harold. They push the Harold so hard at UCB, but the people who teach you to do it don’t do it anymore.  And I don’t know about you, but I always like it when I can see the person instructing me do the thing they’re teaching.  So this is good.

There’s one show in March, with no mention of who’s in it yet, but I’ll probably check it out. Though I do wonder who will be in it… I’d really like to see people do it who haven’t in awhile, like someone in the Smokes or Shitty Jobs or some of the Asssscat regulars. You can get reservations here:

http://losangeles.ucbtheatre.com/shows/view/3437

Groundlings and (but not vs.) UCB

timstaffordtimstafford:

I get a lot of questions about the two schools that I study at, and so I thought I would write about them as a reference point for any and all asking. After all, we as actors have very little money to spend, so why not be a bit informed before spending it. I think I am in an interesting place to be writing this piece, considering I have not finished either school, but am simply in the midst of doing so.

imageimage

Background of Tim: At Upright Citizens Brigade, I have finished UCB 401 twice and am now in my first Advanced Study starting the first week of March. At Groundlings, I have completed Advanced Improv and have been on the wait list for Writing Lab for almost a year.

In other words, I am on the cusp of what both schools refer to as their “Performance Track”. Woo.

Initial Notes:

Below are my thoughts. They reference the main curriculum and the main shows. There are dozens of extra classes at each school and countless shows at each theatre that feature every form of comedy imaginable. This is because of the complex backgrounds of each and every performer and teacher at the schools. 

So let’s get to it. The title of the post mentions “and (but not vs.)” and I want to tackle that fact first. These schools are not in competition. After having a hunch myself, I had the great pleasure of confirming this fact with the head of the Groundlings school firsthand after a few brews at Dark Room. They offer a different product- plain and simple. 

Product Offered: Curriculum

The first thing to note is that UCB specializes in long-form, and Groundlings in short-form. That info you can get from a google search. What I have come to realize is that UCB offers a tool that is in addition to your acting technique, whereas Groundlings is a tool to improve your acting technique.

Since it is in addition, you do not have to be an actor to take and love UCB’s classes, nor to be a great long-form performer. I have seen many “non-acting” writers, and even some “non-acting” non-writers, absolutely DESTROY crowds in improv shows. The skill of Acting (or Acting Training, specifically) is not always necessary. Long-form relies on truth-telling, commitment, and a simple identification of what’s funny. Longform scenes primarily contain justified dialogue as a means of adding information. UCB curriculum teaches you the aforementioned, and how to better it. That’s not to say acting doesn’t help in long-form improv; it most certainly does. The art of acting focuses much on truth-telling and commitment, and aids the long-form improviser in even more ways like spacework, dialects, character work, stage picture, etc.

Groundlings classes improve acting technique. Since Groundlings focuses on character work, their curriculum is almost necessary to the actor. Different from long form, with short form one has very little time to fully inform the audience of their point-of-view. Therefore, dialogue is only one way to add information. Spacework, emotion, stage picture, and character are the others. Without acting, a groundlings scene would be very dry and uneventful because of the lack of training in “funny-identification”. It is also important to note that Groundlings training involves a director who leads the scene or game.

Yes, games. In a Groundlings class, unlike at UCB, there are “improv games” which are important to the curriculum and training. A few that come to mind (and my faves) are:

 1) Family Dinner where the audience gives the improvisers a recent event (ex: father lost job, son busted for pot, daughter wrecked family car, mother ran over dog) and the improvisers try their best not to bring it up, but rather move on with the family dinner.

 2) Talk Show where the audience gives a name of a talk show, a topic, and a personality trait for the 3-panelists.

3)Genres where the director gives a genre (Shakespeare, Dickens, Sorkin, Film Noire) and the audience gives the improvisers an activity or job.

In any of the above games, the director can stop the scene and give the improvisers a new gift throughout. This, again, is exclusive to Groundlings (in this context).

My friend John, drew an infographic about what we learn at Groundlings. Maybe this will help you understand. If not, you will at least know how to plan out a meth lab. 

image

Product Offered: Performances

The performances of each are geared towards different audiences. This section should help explain why Groundlings charges $15+ on most shows and UCB charges $5-10 on all shows that are not free.

The simplest way to explain it is to say that UCB performers perform for their peers and Groundlings perform for comedy audiences.

The main UCB shows Monday through Thursday are all $5 and allow you to get in free with a student ID. Seeing these shows make you a better student and inevitably a much better performer. Because of this fact, the audiences are primarily made up of students. They’re amazing shows stress long-form technique, particularly Harold Night.  Laughs come at times of hilarious dialogue, stabbing call-outs, and a breaking of the “rules” of improv. Students eat this stuff up. Non-students are less concerned as they won’t understand all the callouts and have never learned the “rules”. (Note: for “rules” of improv, look to anothers’ blog. They don’t really exist but are taught in the beginning as a foundation. I am without a doubt too amateur to try to explain anymore than this. I am an honest person. I promise.)

A Great Call for an Edit to the Above by a friend and amazing blogwriter, Caroline. Besides the $5 or free for students shows at UCB during the week, their shows can be great for a comedy audience. Specifically, their late night shows on the weekend. In fact, I have been told by multiple teachers NOT to see Shitty Jobs on Sunday nights as a student. (However, i say go to it; It’s amazing). There are other shows too that are fit for a comedy audience, thus adding to the fact that there are dozens more shows and types of comedy seen at UCB than Groundlings. 

The main Groundlings shows are for comedy audiences and are priced that way. Groundlings students get 1 free ticket to each main show. Therefore, there is a clump of students in each main show, and 1 clump only. The rest is “normal folk” who are just coming for laughs. The laughs at these shows come from seeing funny characters, hearing amazing songs, and feeling fully immersed in the improvisers’ world. The audience needs no information before they come in. They find everything they need in their programs, the words of the director, and by watching the show.

Another thing to discuss is the question of who gets to perform. At UCB, there are sooooo many performers. Countless. Know somebody or be somebody or do something and you will get on their stage. Harold night offers almost 50 performers, Maude night offers over 80, and those numbers comprise 2 of the 7 nights they have shows. There are 30 Groundlings, 11 Sunday Company members, and they have 2-3 nights where they invite their friends/Groundlings Alum to play with them.

That said, Groundings just added a student stage- G3 which will eventually house student shows so that more than the above get to perform.

Brag Moment: I got to perform in the first show at G3.

image

These kids are great.

Two More Things I Think You Should Know:

There are a million and a half indie improv shows in Los Angeles. You are all an email away from performing at these. Something to note is that the improvisers here are primarily trained in Long-form at either UCB or IoWest. I perform with my pleasant crew, It Girl on the regular and I have only seen 1 team that did Groundlings work.

image

This does not mean that they are not welcoming of short-form. If you love it, do it. Full disclosure: I am working on a way to present short-form at an indy show because it is extremely fun for me. Until then, I am content doing long-form with occasional characters thrown in that I have developed in Groundlings classes.

There is a component of Sketch-writing at each school. At Groundlings, it is built into the program. At UCB, it is a different track. At UCB, most of their main shows (weekend and weekday) are improv. At Groundlings, their weekday shows are improv and their weekend shows are sketch with a little improv therein  The Groundlings themselves do sketch/improv. The UCB itself rarely performs together- if ever. I guess Asssscat is the most “ucb-original” and it contains zero sketches. Stupid comparison. How about this comparison- At Groundlings the level below being a Groundling is Sunday Company. They perform Sketch with improv tossed in. At UCB, that same level is Harold Team (improv) and Maude Team (sketch). That works. Now, you get it.

Boom.

There you have it. My comparison/contrast of the two. I sincerely hope this aids your decision if you must make one. I cannot stress how beneficial these two schools combined are for me. There is no difference in the level of talent at either a student or teacher level at these schools. If you have questions or comments, message me and I can always edit. 

I have not trained at IoWest, nor Second City Hollywood, nor anywhere else. Therefore, I did not write about them. For those curious, I hear they’re great firsthand, secondhand, and thirdhand. Never fourthhand. 

Tagged are all my teachers.

Feb 8
nicclee:

improvisorsimprovisor:

improv-is-easy:

scorwitz asked improv-is-easy:



If Game is the thing you repeat, then what is the difference between Pattern and Game?



Game is funny/interesting/heartfelt.
A Pattern (an empty pattern, anyway) isn’t.

I respectfully suggest that this needs a little bit more clarification. A Game is a Pattern, but it’s a pattern of human behavior that’s fun to play around with and helps provide structure to a scene. At its broadest, a pattern is anything repeated. 2, 4, 6, 8 is a pattern. But a bunch of improvisors counting off by twos is not interesting. If you inject some behavior, emotion, relationship, or human reaction into a pattern, you have the beginnings of a game. 

I agree with this clarification. A pattern is anything you do more than once. I would say a game is a specific dynamic between two people with a distinct rhythm. For example, the sadder I am, the happier you are and the happier you are, the sadder I am. We feed each other’s behavior consistently, but we can also heighten the game. It doesn’t matter what the context and the details are because that dynamic can be taken and applied to an analogous circumstance. Game has to do with behavior, but emotions and stakes (and point of view and philosophy) are certainly involved.


I’m sure different schools and generations have different answers, and I can’t wait to see the reblog thread continue. That said, my take is: game is the central funny thing that we heighten and explore. Pattern is, well, any pattern. Chris Farley’s motivational speaker sketch has a game of “bad motivational speaker.” But there are many patterns: the way Farley continually gets in people’s faces, the way he keeps saying “Van down by the river!”, etc., none of which ever take focus the way “bad motivational speaker” takes focus. In fact, those patterns serve the game.
How this distinction has been important and helpful to me: if I play a character in a scene, I want to create a cohesive series of patterns (think Farley adjusting his belt, hunching over when he talks, even the way he talks) that combine to create a recognizable, consistent character. But I still need that character to play the game, which is separate (that’s all the specific details that make him a bad motivational speaker).
You could take many of the same patterns (especially around Farley’s character) and play a different game (say, bad gym teacher, or bad bedtime storyteller). Or you could take the same game and play it with different patterns (he could be a bad motivational speaker in so many different ways).  
Again, that’s just my interpretation, but it’s an interpretation that’s been practical and useful for me getting better at improv and generating sketches.

nicclee:

improvisorsimprovisor:

improv-is-easy:

If Game is the thing you repeat, then what is the difference between Pattern and Game?

Game is funny/interesting/heartfelt.

A Pattern (an empty pattern, anyway) isn’t.

I respectfully suggest that this needs a little bit more clarification. A Game is a Pattern, but it’s a pattern of human behavior that’s fun to play around with and helps provide structure to a scene. At its broadest, a pattern is anything repeated. 2, 4, 6, 8 is a pattern. But a bunch of improvisors counting off by twos is not interesting. If you inject some behavior, emotion, relationship, or human reaction into a pattern, you have the beginnings of a game. 

I agree with this clarification. A pattern is anything you do more than once. I would say a game is a specific dynamic between two people with a distinct rhythm. For example, the sadder I am, the happier you are and the happier you are, the sadder I am. We feed each other’s behavior consistently, but we can also heighten the game. It doesn’t matter what the context and the details are because that dynamic can be taken and applied to an analogous circumstance. Game has to do with behavior, but emotions and stakes (and point of view and philosophy) are certainly involved.

I’m sure different schools and generations have different answers, and I can’t wait to see the reblog thread continue. That said, my take is: game is the central funny thing that we heighten and explore. Pattern is, well, any pattern. Chris Farley’s motivational speaker sketch has a game of “bad motivational speaker.” But there are many patterns: the way Farley continually gets in people’s faces, the way he keeps saying “Van down by the river!”, etc., none of which ever take focus the way “bad motivational speaker” takes focus. In fact, those patterns serve the game.

How this distinction has been important and helpful to me: if I play a character in a scene, I want to create a cohesive series of patterns (think Farley adjusting his belt, hunching over when he talks, even the way he talks) that combine to create a recognizable, consistent character. But I still need that character to play the game, which is separate (that’s all the specific details that make him a bad motivational speaker).

You could take many of the same patterns (especially around Farley’s character) and play a different game (say, bad gym teacher, or bad bedtime storyteller). Or you could take the same game and play it with different patterns (he could be a bad motivational speaker in so many different ways).  

Again, that’s just my interpretation, but it’s an interpretation that’s been practical and useful for me getting better at improv and generating sketches.

The Legacy of Heather and Miles

sabrinalondon:

Tonight marked the end of Heather and Miles astonishing 49 week run at UCB Cagematch.  By their record setting conclusion, Heather and Miles had battled against nearly every UCB performer, including both former academic directors of the school. It was the free-styling indie darling Murdercliff, who took down H&M in a packed-to-the-gills theater. It was an emotional moment. Heather and Miles had captured the imaginations of so many improv fans, who learned from them every week. It wasn’t just the end of their record; it was the end of an era. 

I first watched Heather and Miles in December 2011 when I was taking UCB 401. I remember the rush of excitement surrounding this new dark horse team. No one had heard of them, but they tickled the curiosity of many. Within a few short weeks, Heather and Miles had gained a loyal following who wanted to see what they’d do next. Their shows had an air of magic about them - with Heather’s larger-than-life physical comedy and Miles’ explosive straight men. The chemistry was magnetic. You often forgot there was only 2 of them. 

Heather and Miles painted the universe around them - a whirlwind of perverts, weirdos, and misfits. Their most memorable sets told a larger story, which became their signature. It wasn’t 20 minutes of random funny scenes; it was a piece. In Miles’ Level 2 workshop, we spent weeks discussing “the piece” and how to create a satisfying, unforgettable set. H&M didn’t stop at callbacks - they integrated multiple story lines and laced second beats with new information that changed everything you thought you knew. Just when a scene couldn’t heighten any more, Heather and Miles catapulted it into the stratosphere.   

I’ll never forget the pussy monster, who laid dormant in Miles’ chest until the last minute of their set. When it finally burst out, Miles screamed for help from Heather’s lesbian character, who he’d been mocking all night. In that moment - instead of calling for help - Heather proceeded to eat out the pussy monster. If this sounds insane, wait till you watch the recap video. I’ve never heard louder screams of horror and delight. 

Heather and Miles earned their place at Cagematch, battling legends of improv from New York to Chicago to LA. They triumphed one of the craziest gauntlets on record, obliterating UCB favorites like Skinny Business Will Not Apologize, Dierkes and Fernie, Funtown, Typhoon, The Swarm, Derrick and Convoy. Every H&M show not only had to beat their competitor; it had to top their last show. They set the bar so high that by the end of their run, Heather and Miles were implementing a new form every week. Their musical improv set (which you can view clips from here) was one of their greatest shows yet, and it happened on Week 49. 

It would be enough for the legacy of Heather and Miles to be 50 weeks of incredible shows - but something else remarkable happened. In the last year, I watched my friends and teammates push harder than ever before. Heather and Miles inspired an entire generation of performers. Suddenly, my peers began playing characters and experimenting with fast play. A budding crop of two-man teams became regular fixtures at indie shows, and you saw more people playing multiple characters in a scene. Miles Stroth’s workshop became headquarters for a generation of hungry improvisers, and the talent that emerged from it was unparalleled. At one point, all the major Cagematches (UCB, iO West, and Second City) were taken over by Miles’ performers.   

Heather and Miles redefined what many of us thought improv could be. And while their run at UCB Cagematch may be over, their impact on the community will live on. Thank you, Heather and Miles. You gave this generation more than you’ll ever know.

My life, my face: Being A Performer On An Upright Citizens Brigade Maude (Sketch) Team- Some things you might wanna know or maybe not but...

jackiesface:

Hey Guys,

I get asked semi-often by UCB students while chatting them up in line for shows about Maude Team stuff. What’s being on a team like? What was your audition like? Is it fun? Is it cool? What is a maude team? Who are you?

I was at Sketch Bar tonight, an indie-open mic sketch night run by…

So if you ever wanted to know what it’s like being on a Maude team or auditioning for a Maude team, Jackie Johnson wrote this really wonderful, thorough blog on it. Worth checking out for sure.

Two Awesome Improv Teams. Each Won UCB's Cagematch 44 Straight Times. And Then They Faced Off...

Nice write up on the Convoy vs. Heather & Miles cagematch in the LA Weekly.

(and I promise this is the last post about that cagematch)

(that’s not a real promise, I’ll probably do whatever I like, sorry)

(not sorry)

Dec 7

Video: Best of UCB Cagematch, Heather & Miles vs. Convoy

From Heather & Miles’ record-breaking cagematch win, versus the previous record-holders Convoy:

And Convoy: 

Dec 6

Congratulations, Heather & Miles

Heather & Miles (Heather Campbell, Miles Stroth) have officially broken the record for consecutive cagematch wins at UCBTLA. Last night, they competed against the previous record holders Convoy (Alex Fernie, Alex Berg, Todd Fasen), earning win #45.

This has been truly an amazing run of shows and I love that the improv community has really embraced them. Miles went from teaching a class or two to now teaching 5 classes a week (!). Some of these cagematches have sold out in less than 30 seconds. Even on days where they don’t announce the time the reservations will be released. That’s nuts!

The big question is: what’s next? There’s no more gauntlets (where they have to play past champions) and there’s almost no one left for them to play; they’ve played nearly every UCB regular. Recent shows even brought giants like The Swarm and Derrick for fuck’s sake. I wonder if it’s possible that they’d retire the cagematch (or be asked to retire)? I hope not. I don’t know what it’d take to beat them, but I’d like to see them lose fair and square. I think there’s still a handful of teams that deserve a shot (Murdercliff and recent Improv Prize Fight tournament winners 3 Step spring to mind, along with regulars like Hot Sauce and Shitty Jobs). But maybe it’s not possible, given their following at this point, and the fact that Heather & Miles does not have another show.

And that’s the other thing, I hope they get a show out of this. I don’t know what the rules are for that, but I’d love to see Heather & Miles get at least a monthly show at UCB and expand from there, if need be. Miles said him and Heather used to do their show for an hour long, at iO; I’d love to see that! 

In any event, it’s been an awesome year of cagematches so far. To me, there are very, very few teams who operate at the level of technical proficiency and sheer outrageousness that they do. Some of these shows they do are not just perfect, they’re above and beyond perfect. I’ve seen them play 8 or 9 characters in a 3 minute scene, I’ve seen their sets explode into movie form, I’ve seen both of them play high and low status, straight and absurd, normal people and weirdos, and then those callbacks. No one does callbacks like them. It’s been a great, great year from them.

And as good as it’s been, I’m excited to see their post record-break shows. I’d love to see them experiment and get weird and try new forms. I just love this team.

Congrats, Heather & Miles!